After a car accident in Lansing, determining who is at fault plays a major role in how much compensation you can recover. Fault isn’t always clear-cut. In many cases, both drivers share some level of responsibility, and Michigan’s comparative negligence law comes into play. Under comparative negligence, your compensation can be reduced if you are partially at fault for the accident. If you are found to be more than 50% at fault, you may be barred from recovering non-economic damages like pain and suffering. This means that even a small percentage of fault assigned to you could significantly impact your settlement. If you’re facing challenges with fault disputes, legal help after a Lansing car crash can make all the difference in protecting your rights.
Insurance companies use comparative negligence to their advantage, often trying to shift blame onto victims to reduce their payouts. Understanding how this law works is critical to protecting your rights and ensuring you receive the compensation you deserve. In this guide, we’ll break down how comparative negligence works in Michigan, how it affects car accident claims in Lansing, and what you can do to fight back against unfair fault assignments.
What Is Comparative Negligence in Michigan?
Michigan follows a modified comparative negligence system, which means that fault is assigned as a percentage and your compensation is adjusted accordingly. This law applies to car accident claims in Lansing and throughout the state. Under Michigan’s comparative negligence rule:
- If you are less than 50% at fault, you can still recover compensation, but your settlement or verdict will be reduced by your percentage of fault.
- If you are 50% or more at fault, you cannot recover non-economic damages (like pain and suffering), but you may still be able to receive compensation for economic damages (such as medical bills and lost wages).
For example, if you were found to be 20% at fault for a car accident and your total damages were $100,000, your compensation would be reduced by 20% leaving you with $80,000. However, if you were found more than 50% at fault, you would lose the right to recover pain and suffering damages and may only be able to collect specific financial losses related to no-fault benefits.
Michigan’s comparative negligence law is often used by insurance companies to reduce payouts, so understanding how it works can help you fight back against unfair fault determinations.
How Comparative Negligence Affects Your Car Accident Compensation
If you are found partially at fault for a car accident in Lansing, your total compensation will be reduced based on your percentage of fault. This can have a significant impact on the amount you receive for non-economic damages such pain and suffering.
Compensation Reduction Based on Fault Percentage
Your final settlement is calculated by subtracting your percentage of fault from your total damages. Here’s how it works:
- Less than 50% at fault → You can still recover damages, but your payout is reduced.
- 50% or more at fault → You can still recover for economic damages (medical bills, lost wages, etc.), but you are not eligible for pain and suffering damages.
| Fault Percentage | Total Damages | Final Compensation |
|---|---|---|
| 10% | $50,000 | $45,000 (Eligible for Pain & Suffering) |
| 30% | $100,000 | $70,000 (Eligible for Pain & Suffering) |
| 50% | $200,000 | $100,000 (No Pain & Suffering) |
| 60% | $150,000 | $90,000 (No Pain & Suffering) |
Even if you are partially at fault, you may still be entitled to a significant payout, but insurance companies often use comparative negligence to reduce their liability. This is why having a Lansing car accident lawyer is crucial to ensure you aren’t unfairly blamed or underpaid.
Examples of Comparative Negligence in Lansing Car Accidents
Comparative negligence applies in many different types of car accidents, where both drivers may share some level of fault. Below are a few common examples of how fault might be assigned in a Lansing car accident case.
Example 1: Rear-End Collision with Sudden Braking
A driver is rear-ended at an intersection. Normally, the rear driver is fully at fault, but if the front driver slammed on their brakes suddenly without reason, they might be assigned 20% fault, while the rear driver is 80% at fault.
Example 2: Left-Turn Accident at an Intersection
A driver making a left turn is hit by an oncoming car. While the left-turning driver is usually at fault for failing to yield, the oncoming driver may be found partially at fault if they were speeding or ran a red light.
Example 3: Distracted Driving & Running a Stop Sign
A driver runs a stop sign and collides with another vehicle. However, if the other driver was texting and didn’t react in time, they might be found 30% at fault, reducing their total compensation.
Example 4: Multi-Car Pileup on I-496
A chain reaction crash involves multiple vehicles on a highway. Fault may be split between several drivers, with each responsible for a percentage of the accident based on speed, following distance, and reaction time. In commercial truck accidents, insurance companies often argue that passenger vehicle drivers share some blame, even when the truck driver was primarily at fault. If you were involved in a crash with a semi-truck, an experienced truck accident lawyer in Lansing can help protect your rights and fight against unfair fault assignments.
Example 5: Pedestrian Accident in a Crosswalk
A pedestrian is hit while crossing in a designated crosswalk. The driver is likely at fault, but if the pedestrian was distracted or walked against a signal, they might be assigned some percentage of negligence.
In each of these scenarios, the percentage of fault assigned to each party directly impacts their final compensation. This is why fighting for a fair fault determination is critical when pursuing an insurance claim or lawsuit.
How Insurance Companies Use Comparative Negligence Against You
Insurance companies actively use comparative negligence laws to reduce their payouts—often by shifting more blame onto you, even when you weren’t primarily at fault. The more fault they assign to you, the less they have to pay in your settlement.
Here are some common tactics insurers use to manipulate comparative negligence in Lansing car accident claims:
1. Twisting Your Words to Admit Fault
Insurance adjusters often ask leading questions or misinterpret your statements to make it seem like you admitted partial fault. Even saying something like “I didn’t see the other car” could be used against you to claim you were distracted or negligent.
2. Blaming You for Not Avoiding the Crash
Even if another driver was clearly at fault, insurers may argue that you could have avoided the accident by braking sooner, reacting differently, or driving slower. This tactic is often used in rear-end collisions, left-turn accidents, and multi-car crashes.
3. Exaggerating Your Role in the Accident
If you were even slightly distracted or made a minor traffic mistake, insurance companies may inflate your level of fault. For example, if you were speeding 5 mph over the limit, they might claim that contributed significantly to the crash—even if the other driver was clearly reckless.
4. Disputing Witness Testimony or Evidence
Even if you have witnesses or traffic camera footage supporting your case, insurers might question their credibility or try to twist the evidence in their favor. They may cherry-pick details that shift more blame onto you.
5. Using Michigan’s 50% Rule to Block Pain & Suffering Claims
Since Michigan law bars you from recovering non-economic damages if you’re 50% or more at fault, insurance companies may push hard to increase your fault percentage just past 50%—so they can avoid paying for pain and suffering.
How to Protect Yourself from Insurance Tactics
- Stick to facts when speaking to insurers and avoid giving recorded statements.
- Gather strong evidence, including police reports, photos, and witness statements.
- Consult a Lansing car accident lawyer before accepting any settlement or admitting any fault.
Comparative negligence is a powerful tool for insurance companies to minimize payouts, but legal representation can help fight back against unfair blame. Comparative negligence applies to more than just car accidents. It can impact slip and fall injuries, motorcycle crashes, and other personal injury claims. If you were injured due to someone else’s negligence, The Clark Law Office can help protect your rights and maximize your compensation.
Proving Fault and Reducing Your Liability After a Crash
If you’ve been involved in a car accident in Lansing, proving the other driver’s negligence and minimizing your own fault is critical to maximizing your compensation. Since comparative negligence directly impacts your payout, taking the right steps after a crash can prevent insurance companies from unfairly shifting blame onto you.
Key Steps to Prove Fault and Protect Your Claim
Call the Police and Get a Report
- A police report is one of the strongest pieces of evidence in a car accident case. Officers document who was at fault based on witness statements, vehicle positions, and traffic laws.
- If the other driver was clearly negligent speeding, running a red light, or distracted driving the report will help prove it.
Take Photos and Videos at the Scene
- Capture vehicle damage, skid marks, road conditions, and traffic signals.
- If the other driver admits fault, record their statement or note it down immediately.
Get Witness Statements
- Neutral third-party witnesses can confirm the events of the crash.
- Their testimony is especially helpful when the at-fault driver tries to shift blame onto you.
Avoid Admitting Fault to Anyone
- Even casual statements like “I didn’t see them” can be twisted into an admission of negligence.
- Stick to the facts when speaking to police, insurance adjusters, and the other driver.
Request Traffic Camera or Dashcam Footage
- Many Lansing intersections have traffic cameras that can provide clear evidence of what happened.
- If you or another driver had a dashcam, obtain a copy of the footage.
Consult a Lansing Car Accident Lawyer
- If the insurance company tries to assign you more fault than you deserve, an attorney can challenge the claim with additional evidence.
- A lawyer can also negotiate with insurers to prevent them from unfairly reducing your settlement.
Even if you were partially at fault, having strong evidence can minimize your liability percentage and ensure you receive the compensation you deserve.
If you’ve been involved in a car accident where fault is being disputed, speaking with a Lansing car accident lawyer can help protect your rights and maximize your compensation. Since comparative negligence laws can significantly impact your settlement, having legal representation can be crucial in cases where insurers try to shift more blame onto you. The Clark Law Office can help after a crash if:
- The insurance company is blaming you for part or all of the accident.
- You were injured, and the at-fault driver’s insurance is disputing your claim.
- The insurer is offering a low settlement because they say you were partially responsible.
- Your damages are high, and you need to reduce your percentage of fault to recover full compensation.
- You’re unsure if you qualify for pain and suffering compensation under Michigan’s 50% rule.
A lawyer can investigate the accident, gather evidence, and challenge unfair fault determinations. Insurance companies often use comparative negligence as a tactic to minimize payouts, but legal representation ensures you’re not left paying more than you should.
At The Clark Law Office, we help Lansing accident victims fight back against unfair blame and recover the compensation they deserve.
Contact a Lansing Car Accident Lawyer for a Free Consultation
If you’ve been involved in a car accident and the insurance company is trying to shift blame onto you, it’s important to act quickly. Michigan’s comparative negligence laws can significantly impact your compensation, and insurers often use them to their advantage to reduce payouts. You don’t have to face this alone.
At The Clark Law Office, we have extensive experience helping Lansing accident victims fight unfair fault determinations and maximize their compensation. We can gather evidence, negotiate with insurance adjusters, and, if necessary, take legal action to ensure you receive what you deserve. If you’ve suffered a severe accident, a Lansing personal injury lawyer for serious injuries can help you pursue maximum compensation for your losses.
We offer free consultations, and you pay nothing unless we win your case. If you’re facing a disputed car accident claim, reach out today to protect your rights. 📞 Call us now at 517-575-8131
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About Comparative Negligence in Lansing Car Accident Cases
What is comparative negligence in Michigan?
Michigan follows a modified comparative negligence rule, meaning that if you are less than 50% at fault, your compensation will be reduced by your percentage of fault. However, if you are 50% or more at fault, you cannot recover compensation for pain and suffering, but you may still recover economic damages like medical bills and lost wages.
How does comparative negligence affect my car accident settlement?
Your settlement will be reduced based on your percentage of fault. For example, if you are 20% at fault in an accident and your damages total $100,000, your final payout would be $80,000. If you are found 50% or more at fault, you lose the right to claim non-economic damages like pain and suffering.
Can the insurance company blame me to lower my settlement?
Yes. Insurance companies often use comparative negligence to shift blame onto victims in order to reduce payouts. They may argue that you were distracted, speeding, or not reacting quickly enough to lessen their liability. This is why having a Lansing car accident lawyer can help fight unfair fault determinations.
What happens if both drivers are equally at fault in a Lansing car accident?
If both drivers are found to be 50% at fault, neither party can recover non-economic damages (pain and suffering). However, they may still be able to collect compensation for medical bills and lost wages through their own insurance policies.
Should I accept the insurance company’s fault determination?
Not necessarily. Insurance companies do not have the final say in determining fault, and they often assign blame unfairly. If you believe you were wrongly assigned too much fault, you can challenge their decision, provide additional evidence, or seek legal representation to fight for a fair settlement.
- Michigan’s Heavy Haul Routes and the Rising Risk of Big Truck Crashes - October 15, 2025
- Common Mistakes Victims Make After a Semi-Truck Crash - October 14, 2025
- The Rise of Distracted Driving Among Michigan Truckers - October 12, 2025
